A Comment On Children and Failure

A Facebook friend of mine recently posted the following quote:

Where did we ever get the crazy idea that in order to make children do better, first we have to make them feel worse? Think of the last time you felt humiliated or treated unfairly. Did you feel like cooperating or doing better?

Jane Nelson

I was curious about this statement.  What I infer from her quote is that someone, somewhere believes humiliating people, and treating them unfairly is a formula for positive results.  On the contrary, neither of these two behaviors seem to lend to a positive outcome.  How someone would come to believe that others actually do this intentionally is confusing to me.

“Did you feeli like cooperating or doing better?”  No, I would not feel like cooperating or doing better.  I would feel like going somewhere else, where there are other people who aren’t manipulative, using humiliation to attempt to mold someone into what they want them to be, rather than what they were designed to be.

I’m making an assumption, but I believe that this quote is in reference to overcoming failure, which is a huge sore spot for me, when it comes to raising children, of which I have none.  I do have common sense, however.

If we protect our children from failure, they will not learn to survive on their own.  When they enter the real world, they will soon discover how much they have been trained to behave like a victim when things don’t go “fairly” for them.

If, we push our children into failure, and we intentionally humiliate them, then we are doing as much damage as if we were to allow them not to fail by manufacturing “fair” environments.

One of the most recent examples of “fair” that I can think of was a story of a neighborhood easter egg hunt.  A few kids found most of the eggs, some of the kids found some of the eggs, and a large group of kids found nothing.  A parent who protested managed to convince the rest of the neighborhood parents to take all of the eggs from all of the children and divide them evenly amongst each other.

For those children who failed to collect any eggs, what lesson have we taught them?  Isn’t it more detrimental to their future to falsely impress upon them that it’s impossible to be knocked off the proverbial “horse” in life?  Don’t we want them to understand “getting right back on that horse?”

If a child puts his or herself in a situation which requires hard work to achieve a goal, such as joining a soccer team, or being part of a choir, let them experience failure, so the next time they try, when they work harder to achieve their goal, and they succeed at what they previously failed at, their achievement will be sweeter, and will build self-confidence.  Let them try and let them fail.  But don’t force them to fail, and do all of it in love.

Empty the Bag, or Fill the Bowl

Standing at the edge of the island in the middle of her kitchen, I was looking for something to do.  I had just chopped 3 onions while a playful young man scooted a bowl around the edge of the circular table while sputtering car noises as though his bowl had an engine of its own.  Holding a large, sharp slicing blade, I felt nervous about his speed as he approached over and over again, getting closer to the chopping block ever time.  He was diverted by his mother, and soon after that needed discipline for disobedience.  She asked me what I thought about little boys who utter defiance at their parents.  I was thinking that we should just add him to the chili, cause he’s so delicious, but that’s not what I said.  I said that I don’t like it when people yell at me.

Uncle intervened, via telephone.

When she offered me a bag of cheese, she asked me if I would like to put the cheese in the bowl.  I responded, “do you want me to empty the bag, or fill the bowl.”

[record scratching sound goes here]

scream1Her response answered my question, but the way she hesitated before offering the answer confused me.  Why was that such a difficult question to answer?  It took me a good minute to realize that the question I had asked made absolutely no sense.  It didn’t make sense to her, and it didn’t make sense to me.  But, she was able to answer it regardless.

In the moment, I had no idea what I was trying to say, and then about five minutes after the fact, I figured it out.  You see, there was plenty of cheese in the bag, but I didn’t connect that fact right away.  My logic was thinking two things.  a) either there’s not enough cheese in the bag to fill one bowl, or b) there’s enough cheese in the bag that I would need another bowl.  It wasn’t exactly clear to me that there was enough cheese to actually fill the bowl which means that if the assignment was to “fill the bowl” and there wasn’t enough, then I would need to search for more cheese, and if the assignment was to “empty the bag” then it would either not matter if the bowl was full, or I would have to search for another bowl to handle the overflow.

The reason I didn’t know how much cheese was required was directly tied to the lack of experience and knowledge.  It may sound like a silly thing, but these little experiences are very important for me.  They build confidence, and when I know how to do something, I have more confidence.  That’s nothing new for you either, I suppose.

I was helping Susan with Crème brûlée last Christmas for a party at Mike’s house, and when I offered to help, aside from forgetting that I have no idea how to make Crème brûlée, I was given the task of pouring hot milk into a mixer with eggs.  I had never done that before, and I really didn’t know why I was supposed to pour it in so slowly.  “Am I supposed to do it like this?” I said.  “Slower,” she replied…”don’t go so fast,” she assumed I knew why.  I didn’t.  Now I do.  It’s like the first time you learn why you aren’t supposed to pour a cold glass of water into a glass that just came out of the dishwasher.

This thought process of analyzing the bag of cheese and the bowl is an example of a very taxing exercise that my mind goes through in the moment.  I think out loud.  This becomes a bit of a double edged sword, because it can confuse people who don’t understand how to communicate with me and make them impatient or if I don’t think out loud, I may come across as someone who is non-responsive.

Either way, not understanding how to do something is far greater a challenge than unerstanding that something needs to be done.

I have believed that I have to experience it before I understand it.  I am wrong.

Could this pose some pretty serious problems?  I think so.  If I were to wait around to experience everything I’m not an expert at I would be waiting for ever.  Pudding-proof:  I’m not married because I thought I had to figure out marriage before doing it.  The consequences of pouring the hot milk into the eggs too fast is cooked egg whites.  The consequence of getting married before I’m an expert at it is a broken heart.

The committment issues that I face, as cliche as they may sound coming out of any woman’s mouth, had to do with fear of not achieving perfection prior to experience.  Just pour the cheese, Jon, and don’t ask questions.  If the bowl is too big, the bag will be empty.  If the bag is too big, then stop pouring when the bowl is full.  It’s that simple.

Eyegazing: Overcoming Feelings of Insecurity

sexystareThe exercise of locking eye to eye with a complete stranger, intentionally, and holding until they break away, is one of those activities that will help you gain self confidence as you are introduced to the shockingly ignored concept that everyone else is just as insecure as you are.  As you do this, you will find that your self confidence will immediately receive a boost of energy.

Timothy Ferris in The Four Hour Work Week, Escape 9-5, Live Anywhere, And Join the New Rich, talks about this as one of those critical exercises that will help you build self confidence and move you closer to greater success in the pursuit of your Entrepreneurship.

Sitting in Hava Java today, as people meander through, I have taken a few opportunities to lock eyes with people as they walk in.  Most people are immediate in how quickly they divert their gaze somewhere else, for who knows what reason.  Perhaps they don’t like looking at me, perhaps they’re insecure about being looked at, or perhaps they are just in their own world and don’t notice.  A large percentage of the people walking in have sunglasses on, so it makes the exercise impossible, but for those who come in sporting shiny, exposed, eyes, little do they know the trap that I have set.

I’ll have to admit, it’s extremely difficult to fight the temptation to look away first, but so rewarding when you conquer the fear.  Don’t try doing it with the same person twice, unless you intend to start up a conversation, which wouldn’t be that bad anyway would it?  And, if someone feels uncomfortable enough the first go-around to approach you and ask you what your problem is, as Ferris states, just tell them “I’m sorry, I thought you were an old friend of mine.”

My recent encounter was with a woman who walked in.  I locked on to her eyes and held.  It was difficult, but I did it, and she looked away.  It was at this point that I continued to hold the look.  What happened next was completely unexpected.  She looked again, and then I could really tell she was nervous.  I could also tell that she understood that I had established the upper hand in the exchange and I was the initiator, which boosted my confidence and gave me options.

I will continue to exercise this, and I would recommend that you give it a shot too!  It’s a great feeling to overcome insecurity when you realize you’re not the only one who feels insecure.

He Just Doesn’t Get It

I have a hard time putting together the information that I’m given unless it has a clear end goal. In a real estate transaction, it’s pretty much a 1-2-3 process from start to finish, with many different potential problems that all have common, repetitive solutions. The hardest part of real estate for me, is maintaining relationships.

The hardest part of relationships, particularly romantic, personal relationships, is communicating effectively. That’s what’s hard for me. It may not be for you. I am intuitive, creative, and intelligent, but the way my brain works is different from others. I’m not saying I’m the only one who is like this. What I am saying is that in order for me to understand what it is that the other person is saying, who may not understand the difficulty I face in piecing together their words, I have to slowly process each thought or statement one at a time. When I say slowly, I mean slowly. I am not a debater. If I have knowledge of how something is supposed to work, then I can recall the solution and present it, but if you pose a question in the heat of the moment that requires me to deconstruct the words, interpret their potential meanings, and re-assemble them into a coherent sentence, and you expect me to do it on the spot, I will tend to explode all over you, without meaning to do so. So, processing this information may take me a few minutes, an hour, or it may take much longer. I have been known to understand what someone has said months after they’ve said it.

My learning style is such that I must dig into something, tear it apart, see it work, and then apply it. Without actually experiencing something, I won’t typically understand it. So, communicating with someone who isn’t in that same mind set is a serious challenge for them as much as it is for me.

crashcar1When I speak, I’m usually thinking out loud because I need to hear myself say it in order to continue to think about it. If you don’t understand this about me, then you may assume a line of thinking in me that actually doesn’t exist yet. In other words, it’s possible that what I say may be taken as rote when in fact it is merely my way of confirming that what I’m thinking is actually successfully being translated into communicable words. By testing those words against another person, I am able to hear them and gauge their response. The problem is when that other person has no clue about the mechanism in my head that drives this process, they just won’t get it. Moreover, they may feel throughout the relationship that I’m the one not getting it.  Actually, it’s both of us that aren’t getting it.

We Aren’t Supposed to Be Broken

The bottom line?  Broken relationships hurt.

We Aren’t Supposed to be Broken

I had a Honda Civic years ago, and with Honda’s being one of the world’s most reliable cars, I thought that there would never be a problem with it.  I loved how it sat low to the ground, had a fast engine, and a great sound system, and I loved how reliable it was.  It never broke down and I depended on it every day to carry me there and back.  It never even showed signs of breaking, then one day, it broke.  I never saw it coming.

Grinding the Axle

I have been entrepreneurial most of my life.  In high school I sold candy before class that I had purchase from Revco.  It was very profitable.  Every day I would turn 10 suckers for $1.00 into $2.25.  Not bad.  Not long after that, I purchased a Honda Spree scooter that was pretty beat up for $75.00 and sold it for $300.00 after cleaning it up.  Then, I caught wind of a go-cart that was for sale.  I had always wanted one and this was a perfect opportunity.  $100.00 later, I had a functioning go-cart.  At least that’s what I thought.

I was delivering newspaper at the time on a bicycle, and I saw the go-cart as an opportunity to be on the cutting edge.  I wasn’t thinking I would be re-selling it, I was thinking about using it as a business asset.  And I did.  With minimal expense, I had the mini-car up and running as my primary paper delivery vehicle.  Never mind how dangerous or illegal it was.  What I didn’t know, was that the left rear wheel, which was nothing more than the type of wheel you see on a Home Depot hand cart, was engineered to require two separate bearings, one on each side of the wheel’s hub.  Bearings allow the wheel to spin freely while keeping the axle centered so the wheel doesn’t wobble.  I only had one bearing, and the inside hub, unbeknownst to me, was rubbing the axle.  My go-cart, with which I had a great relationship, was slowly failing over time, and I had no idea it was happening.  The wheel was grinding away the axle, which wasn’t a replaceable part.  Eventually the wheel fell off and the go-cart was broken, as was my relationship with it.

Wear and tear will do that to a car, or go-kart, and it will also do that to a relationship, especially when we fail to pay attention our own personal maintenance needs.  In many cases, maintenance works, but what if there are deeper problems that we don’t even know exist?  What if the problems that are causing the grinding are so damaging, that they permanently render the relationship broken?

Building on Sand

Building a relationship with someone requires certain tools and materials.  When we start building a house without a foundation, with the wrong tools and the wrong materials, it falls over, and we have to start over again…repeatedly.  Until we lay a foundation that can withstand the forces that move against a structure under that structure, it will continue to fall.  Even if we build the house out of bent and broken material, if we assemble it in a meaningful and secure way, no matter what happens, the foundation will remain in tact to catch the pieces if they happen to crumble at times.  All of us have a store of bent 2×4′s in our lives; past relationships that didn’t work very well, marriages that caved under the pressure, abuse, death in the family, addictions, you name it, we have them.  That bent material contributes to the path that we travel on every day.